Rene’s Assessment

My take on developments in learning and technology

Browsing Posts published in July, 2009

In the past academic year we have been looking into using virtual environments for learning. Initial applications during the initial Second Life hype had left a lot of us uninspired. What afterall is the value of a virtual lecture theatre in which we can virtually raise our hands? And unfortunately many of the initial uses of Second Life were of that nature.

Our partnership with the Institutes of Quarrying and Asphalt technology yielded an opportunity to explore a much more interesting use of Second Life.

Through the creation of a Virtual Quarry, a safe and accessible learning environment was created that allows learners to learn by experience in way that would never be possible (practical, responsible) in real life. The quarry currently hosts health and safety exercises, and teaches the correct execution of blasting. In the year to come we are hoping to extend these scenarios both within the quarry, but also in other areas such as forensic sciences, environmental health and geology.

There are more interesting projects being carried out. In the UK, Daden Limited was one of the frontrunners, working with several partners in the creation of simulated scenario’s that supported problem based learning. The psychology department of the University of Derby was involved in one of these projects, and is still very active in this area. I’m not yet sure if this type of learning will find wide application as there are many practical barriers to overcome, cost not being the least of these. Nevertheless these are valuable and interesting experiments, and I’m looking forward to researching their aplication further.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Today George Osborne, the current shadow chancellor and most likely the UK’s chancellor within 9 months, casually announced that which I have been dreading for a while now: The end of the states responsibility for education. He didn’t quite put it in these words of course, but in popular right wing phrases involving consumer choice and ends to state monopolies. You can find the full transcript of the interview here, but I will quote the relevant section:

In education, you know we are looking at bringing in new providers – private companies or voluntary groups or charities – that can offer state education paid for by the taxpayer, but offer a choice to parents and break up the state monopoly on the state provision of education.

It is disgraceful that as a result of bailing out private interests in the banking sector, we will now be taking a step back from one of the most fundamental human needs and rights: Education. it might be that competition will spur the education system into some needed changes that it might otherwise not easily implement. But I think it more likely that a competition with a private education sector that is less restrained by government bureaucracy and funding limitations will not have a fair chance in this arena. And once education has become a for-profit business, will we have any chance of ensuring that every child and adult has access to an equal support for the deployment of their talents, both for their own benefit as for society as a whole?

I doubt it.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.