Rene’s Assessment

My take on developments in learning and technology

Browsing Posts in Resources

It seems that, after static content, the lecture has now definitely made it into the realm of ‘what you share for free’ in stead of what you ‘sell for money’. We’ve had Teachertube for a while now, but this always struck me as being a tutor-to-tutor resource:

Bu in recent weeks we’ve had a launch of two really great resources that provide world class lectures directly to learners. A few weeks ago we saw the launch of Academic Earth which is aspiring to bring us ‘Thousands of video lectures from the world’s top scholars’ such as this lecture from Paul Bloom:

It seems from the embed-tag that Academic earth uses blip.tv, which is interesting. But what I really like about Academic Earth is that is often provides full transcripts and reading assignments, which makes these videos into a truly accessible and valuable independent learning resource.

And today I stumble on Youtube’s attempt to create an online iTunesU: Youtube EDU, which does not seem to have the high production value of Academic Earth, but will most likely develop very impressively in terms of sheer available content, such as this series on special relativity:

Other then being very grateful for these wonderful resources, I must also say that I am intrigued by the speed which with the traditional University is being dismantled. That information, content, and perhaps even knowledge have been commodotized is not really that surprising, but that, only a few years after that development, are already declaring the lecture dead in terms of marketable value, that does surprise me. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that I disagree, I am just baffled by the speed of developments. Either way, I’m going to wrap up this post, as I have some lectures to watch.

The lecture is dead: Long live the lecture!

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

The report  “The Transition to Computer-Based Assessment – New Approaches to Skills Assessment and Implications for Large-scale Testing” has been published. The volume, which is based on a set of workshops that was held in Iceland in September 2008, was edited Julius Björnsson and Fritz Scheuerman. I think it gives a very broad and comprehensive overview of the current state of, and issues around, computer based assessment.

I would especially recommend The article on “CAT as a pedagogic tool” by Jakob Wandall, and “Issues in Computerized Ability Measurement: Getting out of the Jingle and Jangle Jungle” by Oliver Wilhelm.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Cornelia pointed out a report by Bobby Elliott (SQA) to me today:

Online Collaborative Assessment

it’s not too long (about 7 pages) and gives a good introduction and overview to this emerging practice. Particularly valuable I think were the suggestions for criteria to use when marking online collaborative assignments:
1.   Presenting new ideas.
2.   Building on others’ contributions.
3.   Critically appraising contributions.
4.   Coherently summarising discussions.
5.   Introducing and integrating a relevant body of knowledge.
6.   Linking theoretical discussions to own experience.
7. Collaborating with other contributors effectively.
8. Using the tool’s facilities to structure and present information.
9. Providing accurate, concise and clearly written contributions.
10. Summarising concepts from readings.
11. Moving discussions forward.
12. Identifying strengths in contributions.
13. Providing constructive criticism where appropriate.
14. Suggesting solutions to problems.
15. Providing links to high quality and relevant online and offline resources.
16. Using multimedia to improve the quality of information.
17. Observing expected norms of behaviour for the medium in use.
I think these criteria could certainly help addressing the challenge of reliability that this assessment method inherently represents.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

I blogged in April about my excellent experience attending and presenting to the work-based Learning Futures conference in Buxton. I announced then that the proceedings would most likely be published as a special UVAC publication, and it now has. You can read op on the contribution from the e-APEL project-team that I am involved in by following this link. I thoroughly recommend having a look at the entire publication, as I think us learning technologists would benefit from realizing that innovation does not always mean technology.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

I’ve been meaning to build up a collection of learning resources supporting the professional development of teaching staff in relation to (e-)Assessment. Aside from the wiki on our website, I have now uploaded 2 screen-casts on scoring strategies. This is my first attempt at using this medium, so any feedback on it’s effectiveness, or lack thereof, would be greatly appreciated.

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.6.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.